"The paper, “The Personal Is Political,” was originally published in Notes from the Second Year: Women’s Liberation in 1970 and was widely reprinted and passed around the Movement and beyond in the next several years."
A few highlights:
"The very word “therapy” is obviously a misnomer if carried to its logical conclusion. Therapy assumes that someone is sick and that there is a cure, e.g., a personal solution. I am greatly offended that I or any other woman is thought to need therapy in the first place. Women are messed over, not messed up! We need to change the objective conditions, not adjust to them. Therapy is adjusting to your bad personal alternative.
This
is not to deny that these sessions have at least two aspects that are
therapeutic. I prefer to call even this aspect “political therapy” as
opposed to personal therapy. The most important is getting rid of
self-blame. Can you imagine what would happen if women, blacks, and
workers (my definition of worker is anyone who has to work for a living
as opposed to those who don’t. All women are workers) would-stop blaming
ourselves for our sad situations? It seems to me the whole country
needs that kind of political therapy. That is what the black movement is
doing in its own way. We shall do it in ours. We are only starting to
stop blaming ourselves. We also feel like we are thinking for ourselves
for the first time in our lives. As the cartoon in Lilith puts
it, “I’m changing. My mind is growing muscles.” Those who believe that
Marx, Lenin, Engels, Mao, and Ho have the only and last “good word” on
the subject and that women have nothing more to add will, of course,
find these groups a waste of time.
The
groups that I have been in have also not gotten into “alternative
life-styles” or what it means to be a “liberated” woman. We came early
to the conclusion that all alternatives are bad under present
conditions. Whether we live with or without a man, communally or in
couples or alone, are married or unmarried, live with other women, go
for free love, celibacy or lesbianism, or any combination, there are
only good and bad things about each bad situation. There is no “more
liberated” way; there are only bad alternatives.
One more
thing: I think we must listen to what so-called apolitical women have
to say—not so we can do a better job of organizing them but because
together we are a mass movement. I think we who work full-time in the
movement tend to become very narrow. What is happening now is that when
non-movement women disagree with us, we assume it’s because they are
“apolitical,” not because there might be something wrong with our
thinking. Women have left the movement in droves. The obvious reasons
are that we are tired of being sex slaves and doing shitwork for men
whose hypocrisy is so blatant in their political stance of liberation
for everybody (else). But there is really a lot more to it than that. I
can’t quite articulate it yet. I think “apolitical” women are not in the
movement for very good reasons, and as long as we say “you have to
think like us and live like us to join the charmed circle,” we will
fail. What I am trying to say is that there are things in the
consciousness of “apolitical” women (I find them very political) that
are as valid as any political consciousness we think we have. We should
figure out why many women don’t want to do action. Maybe there is
something wrong with the action or something wrong with why we are doing
the action or maybe the analysis of why the action is necessary is not
clear enough in our minds. "
Read the full introduction and paper here.
No comments:
Post a Comment